2018 Dynasty Football RankingsDynasty Football

How Often Do Rookie Draft Picks Hit?

In the Fantasy Football offseason, dynasty owners find themselves weighing the value of a rookie draft pick against established NFL players. While we sit in limbo between the Super Bowl and the Rookie draft, dynasty owners like myself use trading to make it feel like the NFL season never left. Since many offseason trades involve draft picks, even if they are just throw-ins, it is important to understand the value of those draft picks. Trades that may have some defenders on both sides, such as this one, may look more lopsided after doing some digging.

One of my favorite ways to dig, as Rotoviz contributor Jacob Rickrode has done in the past, is to check how often rookie draft picks turn into fantasy starters. I decided to analyze seasons from 2012-2017 to see what these hit rates have been for the last five years. For the purposes of this article, we are looking at QB/RB/WR/TE hit rates in 12 team leagues with PPR scoring. A “hit” would be defined as at least one season with a top 24 RB finish, top 30 WR finish, top 12 QB/TE finish (I considered using 24 WR as Jacob does, but in many 12 team PPR leagues you will find them starting three WR or two WR and a FLEX, so I am counting a top 30 finish as a hit).

A few notes about this data. I did NOT include undrafted players who posted “hits”, players like C.J. Anderson, Nick Foles, Kirk Cousins, Theo Riddick, Spencer Ware have had relevant seasons, but did not have the rookie draft ADP that would have been selected in a 12 team 6 round rookie draft. Some of them, like Foles, moved up in ADP right before the season began but since most rookie drafts occur before the NFL pre-season, that data would not be as accurate as using the summer ADP. It would certainly inflate 3rd round or later to an accuracy that is not a good judgement of just how hard it is to nail a pick that late. Many of the names mentioned are also guys that may go in deeper drafts, 2 QB leagues, or grabbed quickly after in free agency, though I also don’t think they contribute to this data in a positive way either. If their dynasty rookie ADP was not in the top 72, they are not included.

  • The hit rate on a draft pick over this time-frame is 19.2%
  • The hit rate on multiple “starting” level fantasy seasons on a draft pick is 10.8% (excluding 2017)
  • 1st round Hit Rate: 45.8%
  • 2nd round Hit Rate: 30.6%
  • 3rd or late Hit Rate: 9.3%
  • 1st round 2+ Starter Level Seasons Hit Rate: 31.7%
  • 2nd round 2+ Starter Level Seasons Hit Rate: 18.3%
  • 3rd or later 2+ Starter Level Seasons Hit Rate: 4.2%

The first thing that stands out from the data is that 1st round rookie draft picks are more likely to return a multi-season starter than 2nd rounders are of returning you at least one season. 3rd round picks or later are also a complete crap shoot. The 9.3% hit rate on 3rd round picks or later should put into light just how invaluable those picks are. Further, 69% of the 1st rounders who “hit”, had at least one more season of fantasy starter production. For 2nd round picks, that number is 60%. For 3rd round picks or later, that number is 45%. Granted, there are still years left for some of these players to turn that production around, but the likelihood of them doing so on a predictive basis is also unlikely, however, Tight Ends would be the one position who hit their production peak late. Quarterbacks also has a late production peak, but this can be offset by the fact that they would likely be starters prior to their peak, as opposed to a TE who may share roles/targets prior to a breakout. Even worse for 3rd round picks or later: Out of the 20 players who “hit”, only three of them did so in their rookie season. So not only are you rolling the ten-sided die when acquiring these players, but for many of them you will have to hold multiple years to realize value.

So how do we apply this knowledge to our trades? Let’s look at some twitter talk:

This is the trade mentioned in the intro, and now that 3.3 throw in looks close to irrelevant and becomes 2019 1st rounder and Alex Collins for Rob Gronkowksi. I assume most people didn’t put anything into the 3rd round pick, but I still find it hard to believe 31% of people prefer the Collins side, even with the talk of Gronkowski retiring to become a professional wrestler.

How about this poll:

19% of the people who answered the poll would NOT give a 3rd rounder or better for Jerick McKinnon, a 25 year old free agent who just caught 51 passes and need I remind you still has the record for bench reps among active running backs. Show me a 3rd round ADP rookie draft pick with a better chance to return a fantasy starter season than McKinnon and I’ll show you a lie. Something even more unsettling is that 11% of the people said they wouldn’t even pay a 4th rounder! This goes to show that understanding value of draft picks and how they relate to current NFL players can really be misunderstood and too much weight is given to the unknown shiny new toys. I’d be happy to ship a 3rd AND a 4th rounder for a guy that has a floor to land in a pass catching role whether I was a contender or in a full rebuild.

Another interesting one:

Look, I understand that Tyrod may very well never start another game for this owner. However, the 4.03 is such a weak return given what we know about hit rates. If we have four NFL starting QBs in a 12 team league, surely there is a team with a questionable QB situation that Tyrod could be their second or third best QB, and we should be looking to acquire an already established player from that team. I’ll take C.J. Prosise over drafting Bo Scarbrough at 4.03. I’ll take Peyton Barber over Nyheim Hines, and yea I’d prefer Tyler Boyd to drafting Antonio Callaway. These names have similar dynasty startup ADP, and I would much rather a player that I’ve seen play at the NFL level.

All of this doesn’t mean some of these picks won’t hit, or that you can’t find value in the rookie draft. This is simply a way for us to understand the likelihood of a pick being a complete bust for us, and a way for us to consider making owners who overvalue these picks to give us similarly (or better) ranked players for them. Conversely, if you are in a rebuild, you might attempt to trade some older players packaged with later picks to get as many picks in the first round as possible. By increasing your volume of picks, you will also increase the chance to find a multi-year hit player in a round that returns 31.7% multi-year hits.

If you have any trades involving draft picks, comment below or share them on twitter. I would love to hear from you.

The Author

Matt Mesisca

Matt Mesisca


  1. […] often to rookie draft picks hit? TheDynastyGuru.com looks at some of the past seasons to try to figure it […]

  2. jonathan pyle
    March 6, 2018 at 12:08 pm

    Im curious what you would be asking for if you own 1.01 (Barkley) in a Dynasty League. no contracts keep forever. Reddit seems to think it would take a top WR plus multiple early picks. or is he the type of pick that is just not worth trading away?

    • March 6, 2018 at 12:53 pm

      Really depends on your team comp and situation. Without knowing where he lands, I really struggle to put him ahead of the proven RB studs like Bell, Gurley, DJ, and Zeke. If someone wanted to give me a top WR (Beckham, Hopkins, or AB) I would happily take that. A couple of 1st rounders plus Stefon Diggs makes things more interesting and again is dependent on team specifics, how close you are to contending, and your league settings. In any case, if I was the owner, I’d probably want to hold onto that pick until after the NFL draft, as it will increase in value as the hype builds and then let a bidding war happen. I am in the camp that there is no player or pick that is “not worth trading away”, but there are plenty of times where the league simply doesn’t want to pay what you believe the player/pick to be worth.

  3. Phillip Krzywinski
    March 8, 2018 at 1:04 pm

    Have a situation here I really haven’t seen replicated in any dynasty research. I have the 1.01 pick in a .5 PPR league, and was offered Keenan Allen, Josh Gordon, and 1.09 pick, basically trading down in first round and getting two veteran WRs. Team breakdown below:

    RBs: Le’Veon Bell, Melvin Gordon, Spencer Ware, Chris Carson, Tarik Cohen
    WRs: DeAndre Hopkins, Allen Robinson, Chris Hogan, Robby Anderson, Marquise Goodwin

    I feel good about the future of my team and can see how trading or not trading would benefit it, my struggle is how to evaluate the risks regarding these specific players; Allen with injury history and Gordon with suspension history. I would hope that the page has been turned in each case, and am leaning towards trading away 1.01 because I will be both getting at least one WR1 starter with potential for another to go with a low-end 1st round rookie. Is this approach to take foolish since I would be giving up a superstar in waiting, cant-miss prospect like Barkley?

    • March 8, 2018 at 2:20 pm

      What are your starting positions and league size? It is tough because that’s definitely a fair offer (though Keenan gets an even larger boost in full PPR). You definitely lack WR depth behind Hopkins and Robinson, but in this specific situation I would prefer to try and move Melvin Gordon for a WR (like a Amari Cooper/Stefon Diggs). The reason I say this is that I think given how deep the draft is at RB it would not surprise me for the Chargers to grab a RB (such as Ronald Jones or Rashaad Penny). Much of Gordon’s value is correlated to his touches and NOT his talent. To give you a comparison, there are 36 RBs who have had 300+ carries since Gordon joined the league. Among those he ranks 4th in rushing attempts (5th in touches) and ranks 33rd in yards per rushing attempt (only ahead of Jonathan Stewart, Frank Gore, and Jeremy Hill).

      • Phillip Krzywinski
        March 8, 2018 at 3:28 pm

        Starting positions:

        1FLEX (RB,WR,TE)

        League size: 10 man .5 PPR

        For more context, also have Travis Kelce.

        Appreciate the advice. I am a real life fan of Gordon, and the bias to keep him is there but it definitely would make more sense to flip him for an upside WR1. Also have to mention that same owner also offered just Keenan Allen with 1.06 as another option.

  4. Dylan
    March 9, 2018 at 3:23 pm

    Multi sports league here. No contracts keep forever. Would you trade the 1.01 for Vlad Jr.?

    • March 9, 2018 at 7:09 pm

      I’m in a baseball/football hybrid myself. Not sure about your league settings but no. I wouldn’t even trade 1.01 (aka Barkley) for Trout TBH. Reason being that football players (despite shorter shelf life) carry a much greater value to your team in terms of % of total score. A star RB can account for a very large (>15%) of your teams yearly points, while a baseball player can at best be a 5 category contributor which would only be some x% of half of your teams output (the other half coming from pitchers)

Previous post

The Dyansty Guru's Triple Play: Colorado Rockies!

Next post

Rotowire Releases its Top 400 Prospects